Economic Viability – decades of regional benefits enhancing the nation.

An estimated project construction cost of $4.0 billion to $5.0 billion is to be tested.

By comparison coastal desalination plants may be costing the nation $1.2bn to $5bn (single plant) or  $12bn+ (multiple plants) and up to $20 million a year to run a single plant.

Income during early stages of construction may be limited but it is intended the staged development must deliver early positive outcomes in key areas of interest, both economically and environmentally.

Community economic benefits include extensive direct and indirect employment opportunities plus flow on revenue during both the construction and operations phases of the project. Approximately 14 different development sites will deliver economic enhancement broadly across the regions, during the construction phase.

Earlier scheme proposals (to be tested) predicted up to 1.0 million hectares of agriculture opportunities in North and Central Queensland alone await the supply of water.

Given preliminary studies are still to be undertaken it is too early to consider final management and running costs of the completed scheme in whole or part.

It is expected the staged construction of the project could take 5 to 7 years to complete.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Indications are all previous water schemes did not adequately address all possible returns on investment or were confined to the cost of water to farmers alone.

The proposed project is expected to minimise costs through the primary use of existing rivers as natural aqueducts and where connecting channels are required, through advances in environmental, engineering and construction excellence.

Some elements of the project may attract commercial investment in public/private partnerships and direct corporate funding of critical project related infrastructure. A staged development strategy will accommodate this.

Operational returns should be measured not only in terms of user water sales but in direct and indirect benefits to communities, plus savings or relief from traditional losses.

Benefits are expected to be found in:-

– Employment and flow on expenditure in both construction and operational phases.

– New water services industries in river catchments.

– Economic restoration and growth of regional towns.

– New shire revenues alleviating the need for government grants.

– Indirect value of environmental water flow to communities.

– A reduction in maintenance costs given restored waterways.

– User pays water sales to irrigated farming, associated or other industries including

possible mining projects.

– Potable water supply to towns currently dependent on artesian supply.

– River supply to farming freeing up direct extraction from the Great Artesian Basin

– Negating or reducing the cost of drought and flood relief.

– Enhanced food production and sales revenues – Asian market up to 300million consumers.

– Reliability and certainty of production through drought and flood cycles.

– Savings in any future need for water buy-backs in the Murray Darling Basin

– Revenue generated by water amenity tourism

Benefits are not expected to be diminished by economic losses in other industries perceived to be impacted by the project, particularly as catchment communities are small and scattered remotely.

A large percentage of local enterprises are already centred around forestry and agriculture, while environmental protection of the Gulf fishing industry is an integral objective.

Fibre processing plant

Fibre processing plant

Investment in road, rail and air services

Investment in road, rail and air services


This entry was posted in Economic Viability and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Economic Viability – decades of regional benefits enhancing the nation.

  1. Neil Torkington says:

    In 1879 my great grandfather Joseph Herrod took up the Bowie block at the toe of Lake Buchanan which still remains in the family to this day. He started with another well known pioneer Donald McGlashan when they carted stores from Bowen to Bowen Downs. The only thing that has been built since then to open up the inland has been the rail line from Townsville to Mt Isa. To think of using the floodwaters from the coastal areas that cost the insurance companies and government millions every year and use the catchments of the Gilbert and Flinders Rivers and conduits like Torrens and Prairie Creeks that run for hundreds of miles south through the western black soil plains Then joining up with the creeks and channels that run into the larger rivers to the south and create a food bowl, will and only then will we be able to say yes we can expand our population. To say we can have a population of more than 30 million without having such a project is ridiculous. I’m all for what ever project is the best but let us not waste time in doing so.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s