Engineering Viability – applied expertise to a National Landmark Project.

The intent is to minimise any difficulty in delivering water across the Great Dividing Range or other range formations, in servicing inland river and farming systems and in harnessing waters on the western edge of the range

While it is anticipated there will be limited data or knowledge of some field aspects of the project, particularly in the remote northern regions, there have been previous studies and reports completed for the Queensland Government by four of Australia’s best known hydraulic engineering firms.

If desired, extensive experience can be sourced from other parts of the world, notably in the USA and Israel, where the distribution and management of water within harsh environments has been mastered over 100 or more years and on which whole cities and farming communities have been developed and now depend.

We expect the staged development may take 5 to 7 years to be completed at a possible cost of  $4 billion to $5 billion, subject to the study findings.

Engineers in the field

Engineers in the field

Water schemes for the north were first raised as early as 1898. In the 1940’s Brisbane engineer L.B.S. Reid declared that 7.5 million ML of water could be stored in an area bounded by the Gregory Range in the lower Cape York Peninsula.

In the 1980’s consultants to the Queensland Government indicated that the much publicised Bradfield Scheme was viable in engineering terms at a cost $3.5 billion. 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Engineering Viability and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s